A lucrative overtrick

 

Anne Catchpole played well to make an overtrick in 3NT.

Following the Puppet Stayman sequence, it seemed sensible for me to lead AK9 of hearts as I knew Matt held at least four hearts.

However, this also made the position clear to Anne.

She played AK of clubs, Matt discarding a spade.

The 3rd club lead put Matt under pressure. I won the J, but partner had to discard his heart winner to avoid unguarding either spades or diamonds.

Irrespective of my next lead, the 4th round of clubs squeezes East.

This play gave Anne and David a well deserved joint top. Ken Barnett also played the hand in a similar way.

Trump Trickery by Foxymoron

The attempts by Trump to get another "conservative" member of the Supreme Court before the election show his level of trickery. Hopefully the "right-thinking" Republicans will vote against this move, and the Senate will correctly delay the appointment.

"Tricks with trumps" was the theme of this week's hand and John Bernard showed how to make 11 tricks as East despite seemingly having two hearts and a club to lose. 

Jenny's 2H showed hearts and a minor, in the modern style, and Nigel Stuttard elected to show four spades and a heart stop with 3H. Very reasonable as 3NT is quite likely to be the right contract if partner does not have four spades. Maybe he has Jx in hearts for example. East bid 3S and West raised to game. South led a trump, which was as good as anything else, as the battle is to avoid giving the overtrick. Declarer drew trumps, South pitching a heart, and then played the ten of diamonds to the king and the ace of diamonds, dropping the jack.Now he played the queen and nine of diamonds, discarding a club from dummy. 

South threw a club on the first of these, but If he threw another club on the "Curse of Scotland", he would be thrown in with the king of clubs to give East the king of hearts. Therefore he threw a heart, but declarer crossed to the ace of clubs and played a heart to the king. South won and cashed another high heart, but was now forced to yield the eleventh trick to the ten of hearts or the queen of clubs, a trump endplay.

I hope that the endgame will be just as uncomfortable for Donald Trump over the next couple of months. That reminds me of a crossword clue from Private Eye a year or two back:  "Mooning in a suit contract?" (9)

The Good, The Bad and The Ugly by Foxymoron

A number of people have asked how they can have a gentle introduction to online bridge. Three Woodberry groups meet at the weekends for social bridge, free of charge, and would welcome new players as they often struggle to get eight people. On Friday, Andy Conway has a group that starts around 1 pm, and, on Saturday, Stefanie Rohan organises a group at 3pm while on Saturday evening, around 8 pm, Bill Linton runs another group. I am sure you can find the emails of all three if their group interests you, but if not ask a Woodberry officer as we don't normally put emails on a blog because of spam. The heading does not seek to categorise these three groups and was a reference to three interesting hands from a recent match. I am sure you know who played The Good in that film (was it really 1966?) but can you recall who played The Bad and who played The Ugly?

The 16-board match yesterday was between The Goodies and The Baddies. Sadly Tim Brooke-Taylor of the Goodies died (of corona virus) earlier this year. The Baddies was one of their best episodes, featuring as guests Julie Andrews and Liberace, and was also known as "The Nicest Person in the World" and "Double Trouble". But enough waffle. On to the bridge:

The Good

Chantal did well to bid three times on her powerful 13-count, and doubled 2ª to show good spades and then bid her five-card heart suit. Ken Barnett had no problem raising to the good game, and Liz Clery increased the loss with a double. There was no defence, as declarer just lost a spade, a diamond and a club, with no guess in the heart suit. I wonder, if East had bid 4¨ on the second round, whether NS would have reached game. And the sacrifice is only 300 but Gerry did not want to bid "one more for the road". A tough hand.

The Bad

If the first one was good, this was definitely bad with the blame entirely on East for the missed game. The hand is far too good for a weak two, and should be opened at the one-level,. after which even the most timid West would bid game. Given that xx KT9xxx xx KTx would have no play for game, Liz's 3© looks normal. Bidding 2NT then 3© should be a stronger invite, asking partner to go to game unless dreadful. 3©, while it is pass/correct, does not stop partner bidding 4© or 4ª over it, contrary to popular belief. It should say "I have three hearts and three or more spades, and am happy to play at the 3-level opposite a real ugly hand. But East's hand here is very good, not bad, and he should bid game.

The Ugly

What do you call an eight-card suit? The linguist might say "octonary", but the bridge player just says "trumps".  Chantal followed the latter advice when she wasn't have any of defending Four Hearts. The focus was on Bill Linton, North, who made the fairly normal lead of the ace of hearts. Now, South knew North had five hearts, and North knew South had four hearts and South knew that North knew that South had four hearts, and both knew that West had a singleton heart! South's card should therefore be suit preference, but he played an ugly and unclear five. He should play either the two, asking for a diamond which is probably best, or the jack asking for a spade, which will also do the trick. When Bill thought Tim's five asked for a passive heart, saying "don't kill my queen of spades or jack of diamonds" he played a second one and that was that. And South should bid 4¨, fit, instead of 4© on the first round of the auction which will help; an opportunity missed by East on the first hand! This rounded off a big win for The Baddies, by 58-22.

So, always think what partner knows that you know ... Which reminds me of the group of three logicians going into their regular real-ale pub.

"Are we all having Ruddles?", asked the barman?

"I don't know." replied the first;

"I also don't know." replied the second;

"Yes we all are", replied the third.

How do you explain that?

The Squeeze by Foxymoron

The Squeeze by Kenneth Price

There is always something special about bidding and making 7NT, even if it is too ambitious, and such was the case here. The first two bids by West were replicated at many tables and the decision comes on East's second turn:

If my partner showed two of the two three honours, I would probably bid 7H as East. Although that might need trumps 3-2 and a guess in a side-suit, I will be well-placed in practice with a possible ruffing spade finesse, not available in 6NT. Not to mention that playing in no-trumps could be catastrophic if hearts are 4-1 or worse, which will happen 32% of the time. Bidding 6H is also fine, as you are more likely to make an overtrick safely, and can still make when hearts are 4-1. At our table Steven Paul and Judith Hughes got an average for the very sensible auction 2H-6H.

How should you play 7NT on the ten of clubs lead from South, covered by the jack, queen and ace? Both Andy Conway and Steve Coulter reached the grand, in the spirit of the late Kenny Rogers' song, The Gambler. I can almost hear him sing:

"If you're gonna play the game, boy

You gotta learn to play it right." 

They combined their chances well by cashing the ace and king of diamonds, the king of clubs, a top spade, and six rounds of hearts. They had the genuine chance of the spade-diamond squeeze, much better than 50% as it shows up when North has both queens. It also drops the doubleton queen of spades offside, or the doubleton queen of diamonds in either hand, and one can always judge to fall back on the spade finesse if one thinks that is right. When South didn't discard a spade or a diamond, they judged well that South had both ladies and dropped the queen of spades to share the top. The more prudent Mike and Carrie Eden in 7H had to be content with 80% but they were quite happy with that. One of the advantages of playing the squeeze is that you can safely play for an overtrick in either 6NT or 6H, and don't ever risk going off. The pair that went two off in 7NT can console themselves that going one off would not have been any matchpoints either!

Heads I Win, Tails You Lose by Foxymoron

 The origin of this expression is interesting. The first appearance seems to be in 1802:

"The South" and "The North" are not bridge terms, as one might tell from the reference to the House of Representatives. The expression means that you cannot lose regardless and such was the case here:

East opened 1S, fairly marginal, but as a friend from the WLGBC is fond of saying, "I rate a stiff queen very highly!". West responded 3NT which this pair play as a balanced 3-card raise, quite sensible methods, and East has a normal removal to 4S. With a horrible lead to choose from Paul Thornton, who takes his sobriquet from the North Yorkshire village of Bentham, rather than the English philosopher Jeremy Bentham, led the ten of diamonds. Now it costs nothing to run this round to the queen. If, as is very likely, North wins with the king, you can later throw a heart loser on the ace of diamonds, and will still make the contract if the spade finesse is right, or if you can find a doubleton ace of clubs somewhere. When the queen wins, you can still throw a loser on the ace of diamonds, and are now cold.  Some Souths led a club, which is also fraught as Jxxx is very dangerous, but if North puts in the ten, declarer should go down, but about half the field made game here. 

Heads You Win–Tails I Lose is a song written by Brian Wilson and Gary Usher for the American rock band The Beach Boys. It was released on their 1962 album Surfin' Safari. 

After Ken rose with the ace of diamonds, there was no way home: As the lyrics of the song said:

Heads you win, tails I lose
I can't get the upper hand no matter what I do
You'll always be the winner and I'll always be the fool
Heads you win, tails I lose

Extra Chances by Foxymoron

When you need to ruff losers in dummy, it normally pays to do so before you draw trumps, and such was the case on this hand tonight. The NS winners benefited from declarer losing her way on this hand, in 6S, but the right path was not obvious. We settled for the more mundane 4S, and I did not find the right line:

South finds the most testing lead against 4S (or 6S) of a trump, and you win in East. How are you going to set out to make the maximum? It would seem that you can ruff three clubs in dummy and discard one on a diamond if the ace is right, but the timing has to be correct. The winning line is to ruff a club, play the ace of hearts and ruff a heart, ruff a club, ruff a heart and ruff a club. Now a further heart ruff brings you back to East and you can draw the outstanding trump and play a diamond. South ducks, and the king wins, but you now ruff the last heart and play another diamond, and this is a stepping stone to the winning queen of diamonds, having extracted all of South's hearts. If the hearts are 4-3 you are also home, and this line seems better than playing an early diamond, as I did, and hoping the diamonds are 4-3 with the ace onside.

Anything other than ruffing a club at trick two is only 11 tricks, as I found to my cost.

Duck or Grouse by Foxymoron

 

The above picture was taken in a pub with a particularly low beam. It is rumoured that one of the Woodberry members banged his head through not avoiding it, and he cannot remember which pub it was. It has a very good game menu - backgammon, bridge, chess and trivial pursuit maybe.

If you are in doubt whether to duck or not, then generally it pays to duck. Declarer (or a defender) will not be sure of the layout, and may well go wrong. This maxim might have paid dividends on a couple of hands tonight.

Jim O'Donoghue and Iain Macleay breezed into slam against us on the above hands. For better or for worse I had doubled FSF on the South hand, so Chantal led a diamond. My carding here should probably be count but that is often hard to read. When declarer won the ace of diamonds in dummy and crossed to the jack of hearts I had a second chance to signal. What should my heart card mean? The world-class player Krzysztof Martens discusses this in his books and it should be count, but linked to another suit. Here, as West has opened 1H and bid and rebid clubs, he can only have 3 pointed-suit cards. It is crucial for North to know how many spades he has, and South will play hi-low in hearts with an even number of spades, or low-high with an odd number of spades; alternatively the heart carding can be linked to the suit of the same colour, so diamonds in this case. So, here, the seven of hearts might say "I have two spades, don't rise on the first round unless you have six." North can then duck the first spade with confidence and declarer may get it wrong. When North rose at the table, Jim quickly made his contract on a cross-ruff, and did not need the favourable lie in the black suits.

 

It was good to see an old-fashioned auction here. I might have bid 3H on the second round as East, but not giving away information was fine too. As South, I led the queen of clubs, asking for attitude and Chantal encouraged with the North hand. I continued the suit and East won and led the queen of hearts. I instinctively ducked as South as this is a fairly standard situation if partner has Txx or Txxx, and declarer has to be given a guess. East flattered me by continuing with a small heart, playing me to have ducked with Kx, and the ten tricks were worth 60% to East-West. At least I tried. [Don't try this at home as they say, or you will find that declarer has QJ63 opposite A72 and now notices that he cannot pin the doubleton T98 and continues with a small one, making three tricks in the suit]

What were your experiences on these boards? It is your blog, and we could do with some more contributions. Email Andy Conway if you need permission to post.