Cover Story by Foxymoron

I liked a recent crossword clue which is simple but pleasant: Cover Story (5). I will leave you to post your solution in comments, and will only say if it is right or wrong. 

There was a story in the pub that Graham Horscroft needed to cover the second heart on the following hand. It is interesting to analyse if he should have done so:

The auction, I am told, was the same as at our table, 1C-1H-2C-3NT. Against Graham, North led the three of hearts, fourth best and South played the queen and returned the ten. Now Graham needed to cover to block the suit. Applying the rule of 11, South is expected to have three cards (11-8) higher than the three. The rule says that you deduct the number of cards you can see higher than the card led from 11. This tells you how many cards South has above it. So, South can have Q108, Q106, Q1082 or Q1062. If South has Q106, nothing can be done. If South has either of Q1082 or Q1062, then the defence only have four heart tricks and you have a chance if the diamonds are 3-3 or there is a minor-suit squeeze. But then it does not matter whether your cover or not. When South has Q108, as here, you have to cover, and the friendly minor suit lie allows you to make the contract. And South cannot pull the wool over your eyes by returning the eight, as the same principles apply and you must cover, playing for the unlikely QT8 with South.

The People’s Press, November 1835:
We are glad to find among the leading Vanites, at least one man, whose conscience will not permit him to ‘go the whole hog’ in pulling the wool over the people’s eyes

Stefanie Rohan did not get a heart lead, and naturally enough and correctly played for 3-3 diamonds. When they did not break, she only had eight tricks. To play for the unlikely blockage in hearts was not a viable option.