The Uppercut by Foxymoron

It is interesting that "uppercut" gets two dictionary definitions. One is from boxing, as in the iconic uppercut that made Mike Tyson the youngest ever World Heavyweight Champion. The other is from bridge, and here there is a slight error.  One dictionary states:

Uppercut Bridge. a play of a higher trump than necessary knowing it can be overtrumped by an opponent but that if overtrumped, one or more trump winners in the hand of one's partner will be established.

I think that the first part could be curtailed to read "a play of a trump, knowing it can be overtrumped ..." as occurred on the following hand.

We missed the boat here. East opened 1NT (11-14) and South bid 2D, the popular multi-Landy showing a six-card major. I decided to invite with 2NT, rather than force to game with 3H. North passed and East bid 3C, forced. Now I bid 3H as West, invitational with six hearts, but my partner had seen me play them before and put down the dummy. Most reached 4H.

Missing the boat is sea-slang and seemingly first appeared in Florence Marryat, Captain's Norton's Diary, serialized in Belgravia (May 1870). It is now figuratively used for any missed opportunity.

In 3H, North led the jack of spades and I won, cashed one high heart, noting the queen from South, and then played three rounds of clubs. If they had broken 4-2, I could cash another heart and ruff the fourth club if necessary. They broke 3-3, but now North played the ace, king, and another diamond. South uppercut with the jack of hearts and promoted North's ten of hearts. Well defended by Martin Lerner and David Schiff.

Nobody found the most testing defence to 4H, which was for North to play three rounds of diamonds with South "uppercutting" with the jack of hearts. West can recover, however, from this body blow. [My partner points out that I am mixing metaphors here in that an uppercut is to the chin]. West can overruff, cross to the ace of spades and ruff a spade, and then play the ace and another heart. North wins with the ten but either has to concede a ruff and discard or open up the clubs.

Best defence then is for North to lead the queen of clubs, but declarer can and should succeed by playing for the club honours to be split, rising with the king before running the ten. Everyone made 4H, so either all the declarers found this line, or, more likely, the defence was not as testing.

Cover Story by Foxymoron

I liked a recent crossword clue which is simple but pleasant: Cover Story (5). I will leave you to post your solution in comments, and will only say if it is right or wrong. 

There was a story in the pub that Graham Horscroft needed to cover the second heart on the following hand. It is interesting to analyse if he should have done so:

The auction, I am told, was the same as at our table, 1C-1H-2C-3NT. Against Graham, North led the three of hearts, fourth best and South played the queen and returned the ten. Now Graham needed to cover to block the suit. Applying the rule of 11, South is expected to have three cards (11-8) higher than the three. The rule says that you deduct the number of cards you can see higher than the card led from 11. This tells you how many cards South has above it. So, South can have Q108, Q106, Q1082 or Q1062. If South has Q106, nothing can be done. If South has either of Q1082 or Q1062, then the defence only have four heart tricks and you have a chance if the diamonds are 3-3 or there is a minor-suit squeeze. But then it does not matter whether your cover or not. When South has Q108, as here, you have to cover, and the friendly minor suit lie allows you to make the contract. And South cannot pull the wool over your eyes by returning the eight, as the same principles apply and you must cover, playing for the unlikely QT8 with South.

The People’s Press, November 1835:
We are glad to find among the leading Vanites, at least one man, whose conscience will not permit him to ‘go the whole hog’ in pulling the wool over the people’s eyes

Stefanie Rohan did not get a heart lead, and naturally enough and correctly played for 3-3 diamonds. When they did not break, she only had eight tricks. To play for the unlikely blockage in hearts was not a viable option.

One over the Eight by Foxymoron

 

The earliest instance of the above phrase, meaning having too much to drink, I can find is the following, in a Surrey weekly on Friday 15th August 1919:

“ONE OVER THE EIGHT.”—At the Reigate Bench, on Monday, Frederick Powell, of Providence-terrace, London-road, Reigate, was charged with being drunk and disorderly on Saturday night.—P.C. Kimber proved the case.—Prisoner told the Court that he met an old uncle and had one or two drinks. He added “I suppose I got one over the eight, and I suppose I became a little quarrelsome.”—Fined 5s.

It appears to derive from military slang. One over the eight is nine of course. Which reminds me "why is six wary of seven?" Because seven ate nine, of course. But back to bridge. The nine capturing the eight was the theme of this hand from the EBU summer SIMs.

I opened Four Spades as dealer, North, and Roy Cooper, East, exercised prudence for the first time in his life and passed, so 4S became the final contract. They avoided the fate that befell Anne Catchpole and Ken Barnett who went to 5H over 4S and went for 1400.

Roy found the testing club lead and Harvey Fox, West, did well to play three rounds, giving North a dilemma. If East has three spades it does not matter what you do, but what if East only has two? Now it is right to ruff with the seven, and when East overruffs with the queen, you play for split honours and run the ten on the second round. When it is covered, the eight falls under the nine on the third round of the suit.  You will need the diamond finesse, of course, but the eight of spades is 3-2 on to be with the assumed three-card suit.

In last week's poser, the nine of spades also comes into the picture. In Four Spades, after two rounds of hearts, the right line is to lead a low spade from dummy, and if the queen of spades holds, as it did, then you play low to the ten, even if South shows out. North can win the king of spades and force dummy again, but you ruff with the ace of spades, discarding a losing club from hand. All you lose is two trumps and a heart. Other attempts such as prematurely releasing the ace of spades are fatal.

Euro Heartbreak by Foxymoron

I understand how England felt in the Euros. However, "Second place is no disgrace" is a backgammon saying that they should consider. That means, in backgammon, that saving the gammon but losing the game is often the right approach.

Wales would have settled for second place in the European Bridge Championship, but came 30th. That sounds ok, except that only 30 teams entered. Still your scribe did win a few matches. This was one instructive hand.

The bidding was illuminating, South was the dealer at game all. (2H)-Double-(4H)-4S-(All Pass). South led the king of hearts and North overtook to play a second heart. You ruff in dummy? What now?

I will let you "go figure" and give the solution next week. A few strong players I gave the hand to went off. 

The Eight of Clubs by Foxymoron

 

All the playing cards have some meaning. In cartomancy the eight of clubs represents a casual or open relationship, but in bridge it has little significance. It was, however, crucial on the following hand. 

I was disappointed not to be sitting East-West on this hand, as I might well have reached the top spot of Six Diamonds here. With a couple of regular partners we should have bid (Pass)-Pass-(Pass)-2C*-(Pass)-2D*-(Pass)-2H*-(Pass)-2S*-(Pass)-2NT-(Pass)-3NT*-(Pass)-4D-(Pass)-5C-(Pass)-6D-All Pass. 2C is strong, 2D a relay, 2H is hearts or balanced, 2S a relay, 2NT is 20-22 and 3NT is Baron, forcing for one round. Then 4D is natural and 5C is a cue and a slam try. With good controls, West would accept. Declarer can ruff two hearts in hand and only needs trumps 3-2.

No pair found diamonds, and the number of tricks made in no-trumps varied. The right line in 6NT is to try to find someone with Ax of clubs, and then to run the diamonds hoping either for the jack of spades to drop or to squeeze a defender holding the jack of spades and five hearts. But it is a poor contract, and cannot make as the cards lie.

4NT was a popular contract, and, indeed, has ten top tricks. But that was below average and you needed to make 11 for a good score. On a passive diamond lead, say that you guess to play a club to the queen at trick two. It loses and a club comes back which you win. Now the line for 11 tricks is to cash the two top spades, two top hearts, and all the diamonds ending in East. South has to keep Jxxx in spades and therefore has to bare the jack of clubs. Now you can throw him in by exiting with the eight of clubs. But that is very much double-dummy, but is one of the reasons 5NT is making. The other is that you can duck a heart, and then play a club to the king, North must duck this, but now you can cash all the pointed-suit winners, and this squeezes North who has to bare the ace of clubs. If you read it, you can duck a club and make eleven that way. Again completely double dummy.

There is a free podcast from the author at Games and Gambling with Paul Lamford - YouTube

An Expert by Foxymoron

I think there are more quotations about experts than any other category of person. One of my favourites is  "An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes which can be made, in a narrow field." by the Nobel Prize Winner Niels Bohr. A less serious one is "An ex is a has-been and a spurt is a drip under pressure".

The one that sprung to mind after a hand at the Club Pairs recently was, I believe, from David Burn, "An expert is someone who knows what he should have done just after he did something else". 

We had a surreal auction: 1NT-(2H)-6C-(Pass)-7C-All Pass. I am not sure why my partner thought we could make grand ("three aces partner"), and indeed, with hindsight, passing 6C or even bidding 6NT would have won the event. A diamond lead would have given me no chance, but South naturally led his partner's suit. I won, discarding a diamond, correctly ruffed a heart, crossed in clubs, and fatally ruffed a heart to isolate the menace. I could not now make the contract, but if I had planned better, I would have just run all the clubs except one, and then cashed the king and queen of spades. Now, and only now, should I cross to the ace of spades, and this catches North in a trump squeeze in the following ending.

If North pitches a diamond, declarer cashes the ace of diamonds and returns to East with a heart ruff. If North pitches a heart, then declarer ruffs a heart and returns to the ace of diamonds to enjoy the long heart. 

Ruffing the heart prematurely destroys the fragile end position, as the menaces are over dummy which gets squeezed first.

Bridge with imagination

 Although I am not a member anymore this hand was played against two Woodberry members at the Young Chelsea Mixed Pairs so I think it qualifies for the blog.

"Director!" I hear the opponents call at the next table.  The score on this board cannot possibly be correct.  Probably one of ours I say.  Sure enough the director comes over to me and I confirm that West did indeed make 3NT + 1 on hand 18

As I said to the pair who called the director you clearly don't have enough imagination

So for fun as an exercise to the reader how did this result happen (hint there is one card in the South hand that gave the defence a problem)?

Bonus question why did 3NT+1 score below average for EW?

I will reveal all in a few days :)